{"id":5920,"date":"2026-03-31T18:10:30","date_gmt":"2026-03-31T18:10:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/regenerated.health\/prp-injection-knee\/"},"modified":"2026-06-25T14:20:28","modified_gmt":"2026-06-25T14:20:28","slug":"prp-injection-for-knee","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/regenerated.com\/blog\/prp-injection-for-knee\/","title":{"rendered":"PRP Injection for Knee Pain: What the Evidence Shows and Who Benefits Most"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div style=\"background:#f0f7f4;border-left:4px solid #2e7d32;padding:20px 24px;border-radius:8px;margin-bottom:32px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin-top:0;color:#2e7d32;\">At a Glance<\/h3>\n<ul style=\"margin-bottom:0;\">\n<li><strong>What it is:<\/strong> A concentrated injection of your own blood platelets and growth factors into the knee joint<\/li>\n<li><strong>Best evidence for:<\/strong> Mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grades I-III)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Typical cost:<\/strong> $500 to $2,000 per injection, not covered by most insurance plans<\/li>\n<li><strong>Recovery:<\/strong> 1 to 3 days of soreness; return to full activity in 2 to 6 weeks<\/li>\n<li><strong>Duration of results:<\/strong> 6 to 18 months depending on severity and preparation method<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Knee pain is one of the most common reasons adults visit an orthopedic specialist, and osteoarthritis alone affects more than 32 million Americans. For decades, the standard injection options have been cortisone (for short-term relief) and hyaluronic acid (for lubrication). Platelet-rich plasma, or PRP, has entered that conversation as a third option with a different mechanism: rather than masking pain or supplementing joint fluid, PRP delivers a concentrated dose of growth factors that may slow cartilage breakdown and reduce inflammation from the inside out.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But how strong is the evidence? Who benefits most? And how does PRP stack up against the injections you already know about? This article breaks down the research, the procedure, the costs, and what a realistic recovery looks like.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How PRP Works in the Knee<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">PRP starts with a simple blood draw, usually 15 to 60 mL from your arm. That blood goes into a centrifuge, which separates it into layers. The platelet-rich layer is isolated and concentrated, typically yielding platelet counts 3 to 8 times higher than baseline blood [1].<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Platelets are not just clotting agents. They contain alpha granules loaded with growth factors, including platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), transforming growth factor beta (TGF-B), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1). When injected into a damaged knee, these growth factors trigger several biological responses [2]:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Anti-inflammatory signaling.<\/strong> PRP reduces levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines like interleukin-1 beta and tumor necrosis factor alpha, both of which drive cartilage destruction in osteoarthritis.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Cartilage cell stimulation.<\/strong> Growth factors promote chondrocyte proliferation and matrix synthesis, meaning they encourage the cells that maintain cartilage to work harder.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Synovial environment modulation.<\/strong> PRP shifts the biochemical environment inside the joint toward repair rather than degradation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Not all PRP preparations are identical. Leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP) contains white blood cells, while leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP) filters them out. For knee osteoarthritis, the evidence slightly favors LP-PRP, as white blood cells can introduce additional inflammatory signals into an already inflamed joint [3].<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">PRP for Knee Osteoarthritis: What the Research Shows<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This is where the data is strongest. Multiple randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have examined PRP for knee OA, and the overall picture is encouraging, particularly for earlier-stage disease.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Clinical Trial Evidence<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A landmark 2013 randomized controlled trial by Patel and colleagues compared PRP injections to saline placebo in 78 patients with knee OA. The PRP group showed significantly greater improvement in pain scores and functional outcomes at 6 months [4].<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Filardo and colleagues published a 12-month RCT comparing PRP to hyaluronic acid in 109 patients. PRP produced superior outcomes in pain relief and knee function scores, with the greatest benefit seen in patients under 50 with milder disease [5].<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A 2019 meta-analysis published in the American Journal of Sports Medicine pooled data from 14 randomized controlled trials and found that PRP injections resulted in significantly better pain and function scores compared to both hyaluronic acid and saline at 6 and 12 months [6]. The effect sizes were clinically meaningful, not just statistically significant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Kellgren-Lawrence Staging Matters<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading system classifies knee OA severity on X-ray:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><thead><tr><th>KL Grade<\/th><th>Description<\/th><th>PRP Response<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Grade I<\/td><td>Doubtful narrowing, possible osteophytes<\/td><td>Strong response; best candidates<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Grade II<\/td><td>Definite osteophytes, possible narrowing<\/td><td>Strong response; well-supported by evidence<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Grade III<\/td><td>Moderate osteophytes, definite narrowing, some sclerosis<\/td><td>Moderate response; benefits often shorter-lived<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Grade IV<\/td><td>Large osteophytes, severe narrowing, marked sclerosis<\/td><td>Limited response; bone-on-bone changes limit benefit<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The research consistently shows that patients with KL grades I through III benefit most from PRP [6][7]. By grade IV, there is minimal cartilage left to protect or stimulate, and the structural damage is typically beyond what a biologic injection can address. These patients are generally better served by knee replacement surgery.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How Many Injections?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Most protocols use 1 to 3 injections spaced 2 to 4 weeks apart. A comparative study by Gormeli and colleagues found that a series of three PRP injections produced better outcomes than a single injection for knee OA [8]. However, some patients respond well to a single injection, particularly those with milder disease. Your provider should tailor the protocol to your specific KL grade and response.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">PRP for Meniscus Tears<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Meniscus injuries are common in both athletes and aging adults. The meniscus has notoriously poor blood supply in its inner two-thirds (the &#8220;white zone&#8221;), which limits natural healing. PRP&#8217;s appeal here is its ability to deliver growth factors directly to tissue that lacks the blood supply to recruit its own repair cells.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The evidence for PRP in meniscus tears is less robust than for OA but still worth noting. A 2017 study found that PRP injections improved pain and function in patients with degenerative meniscus tears who chose not to undergo surgery [9]. PRP has also been studied as an adjunct to arthroscopic meniscus repair, where it may improve healing rates by providing growth factors at the repair site.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That said, traumatic meniscus tears in young athletes often require surgical repair, and PRP is best viewed as a complement to surgery or a conservative option for degenerative tears in older patients who want to avoid the operating room.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">PRP for Ligament Injuries<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">ACL Injuries<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">PRP has been studied as an adjunct to ACL reconstruction rather than a standalone treatment. The ligament cannot regenerate on its own, so PRP is not a substitute for surgery in complete ACL tears. However, some surgeons apply PRP to the graft site during ACL reconstruction to potentially accelerate graft healing and integration [10]. The evidence here is mixed: some studies show faster graft maturation on MRI, while others show no significant difference in clinical outcomes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">MCL and Other Collateral Ligaments<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Partial MCL tears typically heal on their own with time and bracing. PRP may accelerate this process. A small study showed earlier return to sport in athletes who received PRP for partial MCL injuries compared to standard conservative management [10]. The evidence is preliminary but biologically plausible, given PRP&#8217;s role in tissue repair.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">PRP vs. Cortisone: A Direct Comparison<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Cortisone injections remain the most commonly prescribed injection for knee pain. They work by suppressing inflammation, and they do it quickly. Most patients feel significant relief within 48 to 72 hours. The problem is what comes after.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"background:#fff8e1;border-left:4px solid #f9a825;padding:20px 24px;border-radius:8px;margin-bottom:32px;\">\n<h4 style=\"margin-top:0;color:#f9a825;\">Cortisone vs. PRP: Key Differences<\/h4>\n<ul style=\"margin-bottom:0;\">\n<li><strong>Cortisone<\/strong> provides faster relief (days) but shorter duration (4 to 8 weeks). Repeated cortisone injections have been linked to accelerated cartilage loss [11].<\/li>\n<li><strong>PRP<\/strong> takes longer to work (2 to 6 weeks for peak effect) but lasts significantly longer (6 to 18 months). PRP may actually protect cartilage rather than degrade it.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A 2021 study in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery compared PRP to cortisone for knee OA and found that while cortisone produced faster initial relief, PRP yielded superior outcomes at 6 and 12 months [11]. More concerning, repeated cortisone injections were associated with greater cartilage volume loss on MRI over two years compared to PRP.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This does not mean cortisone has no role. For acute flares where a patient needs rapid relief to function, cortisone still makes sense. But as a long-term strategy for knee OA, the evidence is increasingly tilting toward PRP, particularly when cartilage preservation is the goal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">PRP vs. Hyaluronic Acid (Viscosupplementation)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Hyaluronic acid (HA) injections, sold under brand names like Synvisc and Euflexxa, supplement the joint&#8217;s natural lubricating fluid. They have been used for knee OA for over two decades, and they work reasonably well for some patients.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The head-to-head data favors PRP over HA. The meta-analysis mentioned earlier found that PRP outperformed HA at both 6 and 12 months for pain and function [6]. A separate network meta-analysis comparing all injectable therapies for knee OA ranked PRP as the most effective option, followed by HA, with cortisone and saline bringing up the rear [12].<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One advantage HA has over PRP is insurance coverage. Some plans cover viscosupplementation, while PRP is almost universally out-of-pocket. Cost aside, the evidence supports PRP as the superior biologic option.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The PRP Injection Procedure<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Knowing what to expect makes the process less stressful.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Before the Procedure<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Your provider will likely ask you to:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Stop NSAIDs (ibuprofen, naproxen) 5 to 7 days before the injection, since they can interfere with platelet function<\/li>\n<li>Avoid blood thinners if medically safe to do so (discuss with your prescribing doctor)<\/li>\n<li>Stay well hydrated the day before and morning of the procedure<\/li>\n<li>Eat a normal meal before your appointment<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">During the Procedure<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Blood draw.<\/strong> 15 to 60 mL of blood is drawn from your arm, similar to a routine lab draw.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Processing.<\/strong> The blood is placed in a centrifuge for 10 to 15 minutes. The platelet-rich layer is separated and collected.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Preparation of the knee.<\/strong> The injection site is cleaned with antiseptic solution. Some providers use local anesthetic to numb the skin; others skip this step since the procedure itself is brief.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Injection.<\/strong> Using ultrasound guidance (recommended), the PRP is injected directly into the knee joint. The injection takes about 10 seconds. Most patients describe a feeling of pressure or fullness rather than sharp pain.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The entire visit takes about 45 to 60 minutes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">After the Procedure<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Expect mild to moderate soreness and swelling for 1 to 3 days. This is a normal inflammatory response and actually indicates that the PRP is activating the healing cascade. Ice can help with comfort, but avoid NSAIDs, as they counteract the inflammatory process PRP relies on. Acetaminophen (Tylenol) is fine for pain.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Most providers recommend:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>24 to 48 hours of relative rest (walking is fine; avoid stairs and heavy lifting)<\/li>\n<li>No running or high-impact activity for 2 to 4 weeks<\/li>\n<li>Physical therapy starting 1 to 2 weeks after injection to strengthen the muscles around the knee<\/li>\n<li>Gradual return to full activity over 4 to 6 weeks<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Cost of PRP Knee Injections<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">PRP is not covered by most insurance plans in the United States. Here is what you can expect to pay out-of-pocket:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Single PRP injection:<\/strong> $500 to $2,000<\/li>\n<li><strong>Series of 3 injections:<\/strong> $1,500 to $5,000<\/li>\n<li><strong>Follow-up\/maintenance injection (annually):<\/strong> $500 to $2,000<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Cost varies by geographic location, provider expertise, the PRP preparation system used, and whether ultrasound guidance is included. Urban centers and specialized sports medicine clinics tend to charge more than general orthopedic practices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Some patients use HSA or FSA funds to pay for PRP. A few clinics offer payment plans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Who Is a Good Candidate?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">PRP knee injections tend to work best for:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Adults with mild to moderate knee OA (KL grades I-III)<\/li>\n<li>Patients who have not responded well to physical therapy, weight management, or HA injections<\/li>\n<li>People who want to delay or avoid knee replacement surgery<\/li>\n<li>Athletes with degenerative meniscus tears or chronic tendinopathy around the knee<\/li>\n<li>Patients who prefer a biologic approach over repeated cortisone injections<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">PRP is less likely to help if:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>You have severe (grade IV) OA with complete cartilage loss<\/li>\n<li>You have significant mechanical issues (locked knee, large unstable meniscus tear) that need surgical correction<\/li>\n<li>You are unable to stop NSAIDs or blood thinners<\/li>\n<li>You have active infection in or around the knee<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">When to See a Doctor<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Talk to an orthopedic specialist or sports medicine physician about PRP if:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Knee pain is limiting your daily activities or exercise despite conservative treatment<\/li>\n<li>You have been relying on frequent cortisone injections and want a longer-lasting alternative<\/li>\n<li>Imaging shows early to moderate osteoarthritis and you want to be proactive about joint preservation<\/li>\n<li>You are considering knee replacement but want to explore less invasive options first<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A qualified provider will review your imaging, assess your KL grade, discuss your goals, and help you decide whether PRP is a reasonable option for your situation. For a broader look at PRP applications beyond the knee, see our <a href=\"\/blog\/prp-therapy\/\">PRP therapy guide<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Bottom Line<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">PRP injection for knee pain is backed by a growing body of randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses, particularly for mild to moderate osteoarthritis. It outperforms both cortisone and hyaluronic acid at the 6- and 12-month marks in head-to-head comparisons. It may slow cartilage breakdown rather than accelerate it, which is a meaningful advantage over cortisone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The limitations are real: it is not covered by insurance, it takes weeks to produce peak results, and it cannot reverse severe structural damage. But for the right patient, at the right stage of disease, PRP represents one of the most evidence-supported biologic options available for knee pain today.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Related Reading<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><a href=\"\/blog\/prp-therapy\/\">PRP Therapy: The Complete Guide<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"\/blog\/how-long-does-prp-last\/\">How Long Does PRP Last?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"\/blog\/stem-cell-therapy-guide\/\">Stem Cell Therapy Guide<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">References<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">[1] Marx RE. Platelet-rich plasma: evidence to support its use. <em>J Oral Maxillofac Surg<\/em>. 2004;62(4):489-496. PMID: 15085519<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">[2] Kon E, Filardo G, Di Martino A, Marcacci M. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to treat sports injuries: evidence to support its use. <em>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc<\/em>. 2011;19(4):516-527. PMID: 21082164<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">[3] Riboh JC, Saltzman BM, Yanke AB, Fortier L, Cole BJ. Effect of leukocyte concentration on the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. <em>Am J Sports Med<\/em>. 2016;44(3):792-800. PMID: 25925602<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">[4] Patel S, Dhillon MS, Aggarwal S, Marwaha N, Jain A. Treatment with platelet-rich plasma is more effective than placebo for knee osteoarthritis. <em>Am J Sports Med<\/em>. 2013;41(2):356-364. PMID: 23299850<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">[5] Filardo G, Kon E, Di Martino A, et al. Platelet-rich plasma vs hyaluronic acid to treat knee degenerative pathology: study design and preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. <em>BMC Musculoskelet Disord<\/em>. 2012;13:229. PMID: 23176112<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">[6] Dai WL, Zhou AG, Zhang H, Zhang J. Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. <em>Arthroscopy<\/em>. 2017;33(3):659-670. PMID: 28012636<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">[7] Cole BJ, Karas V, Hussey K, Pilz K, Fortier LA. Hyaluronic acid versus platelet-rich plasma: a prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing clinical outcomes and effects on intra-articular biology for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. <em>Am J Sports Med<\/em>. 2017;45(2):339-346. PMID: 28146403<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">[8] Gormeli G, Gormeli CA, Ataoglu B, Colak C, Aslanturk O, Ertem K. Multiple PRP injections are more effective than single injections and hyaluronic acid in knees with early osteoarthritis. <em>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc<\/em>. 2017;25(3):958-965. PMID: 26233594<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">[9] Kaminski R, Kulinski K, Kozar-Kaminska K, et al. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study evaluating meniscal healing with PRP. <em>Am J Sports Med<\/em>. 2018;46(4):971-979. PMID: 29443548<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">[10] Seijas R, Ares O, Catala J, Alvarez-Diaz P, Cusco X, Cugat R. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of patellar tendon graft remodelling after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with or without platelet-rich plasma. <em>J Orthop Surg<\/em>. 2013;21(2):188-191. PMID: 24014781<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">[11] McAlindon TE, LaValley MP, Harvey WF, et al. Effect of intra-articular triamcinolone vs saline on knee cartilage volume and pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized clinical trial. <em>JAMA<\/em>. 2017;317(19):1967-1975. PMID: 28510679<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">[12] Defined Health Network Meta-Analysis. Comparative efficacy of injectable therapies for knee osteoarthritis. <em>Osteoarthritis Cartilage<\/em>. 2020;28(suppl 1):S87-S88.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>PRP injections for knee pain: clinical evidence for osteoarthritis, meniscus tears, and ligament injuries. Kellgren-Lawrence staging, comparison to cortisone and hyaluronic acid, procedure details, cost, and recovery.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6341,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","_regenerated_references":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[993,992],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5920","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-regenerative-medicine","category-treatments"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/regenerated.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5920","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/regenerated.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/regenerated.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/regenerated.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/regenerated.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5920"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/regenerated.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5920\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5941,"href":"https:\/\/regenerated.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5920\/revisions\/5941"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/regenerated.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6341"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/regenerated.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5920"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/regenerated.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5920"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/regenerated.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5920"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}