We read the research so you can make real decisions.
Regenerated is an independent health research platform. We translate peer-reviewed science on regenerative medicine, functional health, and chronic illness into guides that patients, practitioners, and curious people can actually use.
Why This Exists
There are millions of people living with chronic conditions who have run out of answers from conventional medicine. Autoimmune disease. Chronic fatigue. Post-viral syndromes. Hormonal dysfunction. Gut disorders. Pain that does not respond to standard treatment.
These people are not looking for miracle cures. They are looking for honest information about what might actually help. And that information exists. It sits in clinical trials, peer-reviewed journals, and medical conferences around the world. The problem is access. The research is written for other researchers, hidden behind paywalls, and scattered across thousands of publications.
Meanwhile, the internet is full of marketing claims, anecdotes presented as evidence, and clinics that overpromise and underdeliver. Patients deserve better.
Regenerated exists to close that gap. Every guide we publish is sourced from real research, cites specific studies, and tells you both what the evidence supports and where the evidence falls short.
What We Cover
We cover the full spectrum of regenerative and functional health. Not just the treatments that generate the most hype, but the ones generating the most evidence.
Treatments
- Stem Cell Therapy and PRP
- Peptide Therapy (BPC-157, thymosin, GH peptides)
- NAD+ IV and IV Therapy
- Hormone Replacement and TRT
- Hyperbaric Oxygen and Ozone Therapy
- Ketamine and Psychedelic Therapy
- Neurofeedback and TMS
- Shockwave Therapy and Laser/LLLT
- Chelation and Low Dose Naltrexone
We also publish focused cluster articles on specific subtopics: cost breakdowns, treatment comparisons, condition-specific protocols, and patient questions that deserve real answers backed by citations.
Our Editorial Standards
Every piece of content on Regenerated follows these rules:
- Cite specific studies. We reference peer-reviewed research, clinical trials, and systematic reviews. We name the journal, the authors, and the year. Vague claims like “studies show” are not good enough.
- Show the evidence level. There is a difference between a mouse study and a 500-person randomized controlled trial. We tell you which one we are referencing and rate the overall evidence strength for each treatment and condition.
- Be honest about limitations. If the evidence is promising but preliminary, we say so. If a treatment is overhyped relative to its data, we say that too. We are not here to sell you anything.
- No conflicts of interest. We do not accept payment from clinics, supplement companies, or device manufacturers to feature or promote their products. Our guides are editorially independent.
- Write for real people. Medical jargon has its place. That place is not a guide written for patients making treatment decisions. We explain mechanisms in plain language without dumbing down the science.
How We Are Different
| Regenerated | WebMD / Healthline | Clinic Websites | Reddit / Forums | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | Regenerative and functional medicine specifically | Broad, mainstream medicine | Their own services | Patient anecdotes |
| Evidence cited | Named studies, specific journals | Sometimes, often vague | Rarely | Never |
| Conflicts of interest | None. Editorially independent | Ad-supported | Selling their services | None, but unverified |
| Depth | 3,000-5,000 word guides with evidence grading | 500-1,500 words | Marketing-level | Varies wildly |
| Regenerative coverage | 170+ guides across 40+ topics | Minimal | Their specialty only | Scattered |
Our Approach to Science
We take a pragmatic view of evidence. Regenerative medicine is a young field. Waiting for 10-year, 10,000-patient studies before writing about a treatment means ignoring promising therapies that are helping people today. At the same time, preclinical results in mice do not automatically translate to humans.
Our approach: report what the evidence shows at each level, clearly label the evidence strength, and let readers make informed decisions with their practitioners. We do not make treatment recommendations. We give you the information to have better conversations with your doctor.
When we grade evidence, we use a straightforward system:
- Established: Multiple RCTs, systematic reviews, FDA approval, or inclusion in clinical guidelines.
- Promising: Positive RCTs (small to moderate), consistent clinical experience, strong mechanistic rationale.
- Early: Preclinical data, case series, pilot studies. Interesting but needs more human data.
- Insufficient: Mostly anecdotal. The research has not caught up yet.
The Numbers
170+
Research-backed guides published
40+
Conditions and treatments covered
0
Sponsored posts or paid placements
Medical Disclaimer
Regenerated provides health information, not medical advice. Our content is for educational purposes and should not be used as a substitute for professional medical consultation, diagnosis, or treatment. Always work with a qualified healthcare provider before starting any new therapy or making changes to an existing treatment plan.
Read our full Medical Disclaimer and Privacy Policy.
Get in Touch
Have a question about our content? Found an error? Want to suggest a topic we should cover? Reach us at our contact page.
We read every message. If you point us to a better study or a factual error, we will update the guide and credit you.