Grip Strength Percentile Calculator
- Calculator
- About 3 min
- Mathiowetz 1985 adult norms, right hand
- Runs in your browser, nothing is sent
- Medical review: Medical review pending
What this calculator works out
Grip strength is the cheapest whole-body strength marker that tracks with health outcomes in large studies. A number on its own means little; the same 30 kg is a strong reading for a woman of 70 and a weak one for a man of 35, so the calculator puts your reading in the context of people of your age and sex.
-
1
Percentile for your age and sex
-
2
The band mean and the gap
-
3
The low-strength cut-offs
How this compares with a typical online quiz
| Feature | Typical free quiz | Regenerated.com |
|---|---|---|
| Norms named with the paper | Rarely | Mathiowetz et al. 1985, right hand, by sex and five-year band |
| Percentile method explained | No | Yes: a normal approximation on the published mean and SD, stated as such |
| Sarcopenia cut-offs shown | Sometimes, without a source | EWGSOP2 2019: below 27 kg men, below 16 kg women |
| Measurement protocol described | Rarely | Yes: seated, elbow at 90 degrees, second handle position, best of three |
| Pounds converted | Sometimes | Yes: enter kg, the help line gives the conversion |
| Answers sent to a server | Often | Never; scored in your browser, counts-only events |
How to take a reading the norms can be compared with
The Mathiowetz norms were collected with a Jamar hydraulic dynamometer set to the second handle position, with the person seated, shoulder at the side, elbow bent to 90 degrees and the forearm and wrist in a neutral position. Each person squeezed as hard as they could three times and the mean of the three was recorded. The Southampton protocol described by Roberts and colleagues in 2011 uses the same posture and is the one most research studies follow today; it takes the best of three rather than the mean.
If you measure at home, use a calibrated dynamometer in the same position, rest about a minute between squeezes, and test the hand you write with. Readings taken standing, with the elbow straight, or on a spring-loaded gauge that has not been calibrated can differ by several kilograms from the norms and will shift the percentile. Pain, a recent hand or wrist injury and arthritis in the fingers all lower grip without saying anything about the rest of your body.
Cheap digital dynamometers often read high. If your reading looks surprisingly good, ask the clinic or physical therapy practice that measured you which device they used and whether it is checked against a known weight.
Why grip strength matters for longevity
In the PURE study, which followed almost 140,000 adults in 17 countries for about four years, each 5 kg lower grip strength was associated with a 16 percent higher risk of death from any cause, a 17 percent higher risk of cardiovascular death, and higher risks of heart attack and stroke, after adjusting for age, sex, education, activity and other factors. Grip strength predicted death more strongly than systolic blood pressure did. That does not mean a stronger grip causes a longer life; it means grip is a convenient window onto overall muscle mass and function, which are what actually matter.
Low grip is also one of the two findings that define probable sarcopenia in the EWGSOP2 consensus, alongside a slow chair-stand test. Sarcopenia is the loss of muscle mass and strength with age, and it is treatable: progressive resistance training is the intervention with the strongest evidence, with adequate protein intake as the supporting measure. A low percentile on this page is a reason to measure properly and to start or adjust a strength program, not a verdict.
Methodology and sources
The calculator compares your reading with the adult norms published by Mathiowetz, Kashman, Volland, Weber, Dowe and Rogers in 1985. They tested 628 volunteers aged 20 to 94 in the Milwaukee area who were free of conditions affecting upper-limb strength, using a Jamar dynamometer in the second handle position, and reported the mean and standard deviation of grip in pounds for the right and left hand in twelve age bands from 20 to 24 up to 75 and over, separately for men and women. This page uses the right-hand table, converts pounds to kilograms at 2.2046 lb per kg, and reads your sex and age into the matching band. The norms are North American, more than forty years old, and were collected on a specific device and protocol; readings on other devices, in other populations and especially in people over 75, where the top band is wide, are less certain. The paper reports means, standard deviations and ranges, not percentiles, so the percentile here is a normal approximation on their numbers rather than a published centile table.
The arithmetic: the band mean and standard deviation are converted to kilograms, your reading is turned into a z-score, z = (your kg - band mean kg) / band SD kg, and the percentile is the area under the standard normal curve below that z, times 100. Worked example: a 35-year-old man gripping 54.3 kg (119.7 lb) is exactly at the mean for the men's 35 to 39 band (119.7 lb, SD 24.0 lb, so 54.3 kg and 10.9 kg), z is 0, and the percentile is 50. A 62-year-old woman gripping 20 kg is read against the women's 60 to 64 band (55.1 lb, SD 10.1 lb, so 25.0 kg and 4.6 kg): z is -1.09, which is the 14th percentile, and her reading is above the 16 kg cut-off for women.
The low-strength thresholds come from the 2019 revision of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2): grip strength below 27 kg in men and below 16 kg in women marks probable sarcopenia, to be confirmed by a measure of muscle quantity. Those cut-offs were set on UK data by Dodds and colleagues (2014), who pooled twelve British studies, and they are fixed values rather than age-adjusted percentiles. The percentile bands on this page are educational orientation points, not a published grading; the two fixed cut-offs are the only numbers here with a guideline behind them.
Medical review: Medical review pending. Last updated .
References
- Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66(2):69-74. PMID 3970660
- Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):16-31. doi:10.1093/ageing/afy169
- Leong DP, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, et al. Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. Lancet. 2015;386(9990):266-273. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62000-6
- Dodds RM, Syddall HE, Cooper R, et al. Grip strength across the life course: normative data from twelve British studies. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e113637. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113637
- Roberts HC, Denison HJ, Martin HJ, et al. A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age Ageing. 2011;40(4):423-429. doi:10.1093/ageing/afr051