“Brain Injury Rehabilitation: Evidence-Based Approaches to Recovery”

Brain injury rehabilitation is a coordinated program of physical, occupational, speech and cognitive therapy, usually led by a physiatrist or neurologist, that helps people regain function after a traumatic brain injury (TBI) or other acquired brain injury. A Cochrane review by Turner-Stokes and colleagues (2015) found that multidisciplinary rehabilitation improves outcomes for working-age adults, with more intensive programs linked to faster gains, while newer adjuncts such as hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), neurofeedback and TMS rest on smaller and more mixed evidence.

What Is Brain Injury Rehabilitation?

Brain injury rehabilitation, also called neurorehabilitation or TBI rehab, is the structured process of restoring physical, cognitive, communication and emotional function after damage to the brain. It applies to traumatic brain injury from falls, crashes, sports and blasts, and to non-traumatic acquired brain injury (ABI) from stroke, anoxia, infection or tumors.

The core disciplines are physical therapy (PT), occupational therapy (OT), speech-language pathology (SLP) and neuropsychology, coordinated by a physiatrist (a physical medicine and rehabilitation, or PM&R, physician) or a neurologist. Programs range from inpatient rehabilitation units after a severe injury to outpatient and community programs for concussion and post-concussion syndrome (PCS).

Rehabilitation goals are functional: walking safely, managing medications, returning to school or work, and rebuilding relationships. Teams track progress with standard tools such as the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended and the Rancho Los Amigos Levels of Cognitive Functioning, which describe recovery in stages from unresponsiveness to purposeful, independent behavior.

Rethinking What Rehabilitation Can Achieve

For most of the twentieth century, brain injury rehabilitation operated on a fairly constrained set of assumptions: neurons do not regenerate, recovery largely plateaus after one to two years, and the goal is compensation for deficits rather than restoration of lost function. Each of those assumptions has been significantly revised by modern neuroscience.

Adult neurogenesis in humans appears limited to a few regions and is still debated, but the brain maintains robust capacity for synaptic plasticity at any age and can continue recovering well beyond the traditional one-to-two year window when given appropriate stimulation and support [1]. This does not mean that all lost function can always be recovered. It does mean that the therapeutic ceiling is higher than previously thought, and that patients who were told they had reached their maximum recovery may have more potential than they were led to believe.

This shift in understanding has driven a parallel expansion in what rehabilitation programs can offer. Traditional disciplines (physical, occupational, and speech therapy) remain foundational, but the field has grown to incorporate cognitive rehabilitation technology, neuromodulation, regenerative medicine, and precision diagnostics that allow far more targeted treatment than was possible even a decade ago.

The Neuroplasticity Basis for Rehabilitation

Neuroplasticity is the umbrella term for the brain's capacity to change its structure and function in response to experience, injury, and intervention. After brain injury, plasticity works in both directions: it can support recovery through adaptive reorganization, but it can also consolidate maladaptive patterns (like the pathological slow-wave activity seen in PCS) if the brain is not guided toward healthy function [2].

Effective rehabilitation works by harnessing plasticity deliberately: providing the right type of repetitive, goal-directed stimulation to drive adaptive reorganization while addressing the biological barriers to plasticity, including hypoxia, neuroinflammation, metabolic dysfunction, and disrupted neurotrophic factor signaling.

This is where some programs add regenerative and neuromodulation therapies. These therapies do not replace the learning and practice that drives plasticity. The working idea is that they may create conditions in which plasticity occurs more readily, an idea that is better supported for some therapies than others, as the evidence table further down shows.

What Are the Stages of Brain Injury Rehabilitation?

Brain injury rehabilitation usually moves through four stages, and the setting changes as the person's medical needs fall and their independence grows. Not everyone passes through every stage: many people with a mild TBI or concussion start and finish in outpatient care.

1. Acute care. In the hospital or trauma center, the team stabilizes the injury, controls swelling and pressure in the brain, and starts early mobility, swallowing and communication work as soon as it is safe.
2. Inpatient rehabilitation. In an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) or a dedicated brain injury unit, the person receives several hours of combined PT, OT and speech therapy each day under physician supervision.
3. Post-acute rehabilitation. Outpatient clinics, day treatment programs and residential programs continue therapy while the person lives at home or in a supported setting, with a growing focus on cognition, behavior and community skills.
4. Community re-entry and long-term support. Vocational rehabilitation, supported employment, school re-entry, peer support and periodic re-assessment help people sustain and extend gains over years.

How Long Does Brain Injury Rehabilitation Take?

Brain injury rehabilitation takes anywhere from a few weeks to several years, depending on the severity of the injury, the areas of the brain involved, age, and the support available at home. Most people with a concussion recover within weeks, while a minority develop persistent post-concussion symptoms that need months of targeted therapy.

After a moderate or severe TBI, the fastest gains usually come in the first six months, and progress often continues more slowly for years. The old view of a hard plateau at one to two years has softened: trials such as Boussi-Gross et al. (2013) included people one to five years after injury, and long-term follow-up from the TBI Model Systems programs funded by the US Department of Health and Human Services shows that many people keep changing, for better or worse, long after formal therapy ends.

Because recovery is uneven, good programs set goals in short blocks, re-test, and adjust. A program that cannot tell you how it measures progress is harder to judge than one that re-assesses at set intervals.

Physical and Occupational Therapy

Physical therapy after brain injury addresses motor impairments, balance, coordination, gait, and functional mobility. For moderate and severe TBI, physical therapy in the acute and subacute phases targets basic motor recovery, spasticity management, and prevention of secondary complications like contractures and pressure injuries. As recovery progresses, the focus shifts to higher-level tasks: return to driving, return to sport, and the motor demands of independent living.

After concussion, physical therapists also run vestibular rehabilitation for dizziness and balance problems, and graded aerobic exercise programs that raise activity in steps below the level that provokes symptoms. Neuro-optometric or vision therapy is sometimes added for double vision, eye-tracking problems and light sensitivity.

Occupational therapy addresses the practical intersection of cognitive and physical recovery: the ability to perform daily activities, manage a home, return to work, and engage in meaningful roles. Neuropsychological assessment guides OT goal-setting, identifying the specific cognitive deficits (attention, memory, executive function, processing speed) that are limiting functional independence and tailoring interventions accordingly [3].

Task-specific training, rather than general conditioning, is consistently shown to produce more durable functional gains. The brain learns most efficiently through repeated practice of the specific task being targeted, a principle sometimes called task-specific neuroplasticity. Simulated activities of daily living, real-world community re-entry tasks, and graded return-to-work programs all apply this principle.

Speech and Language Therapy

Cognitive-communication disorders are among the most functionally limiting consequences of TBI. These include difficulties with word retrieval, reading comprehension, organizing and expressing ideas, following complex instructions, and social communication. The formal aphasia and dysarthria seen in focal left hemisphere strokes is distinct from the broader cognitive-communication impairment typical of TBI, which reflects more distributed disruption to the neural networks supporting language, attention, and executive function [4].

Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) working in TBI rehabilitation assess the full spectrum of communication and swallowing function, develop individualized treatment plans, and increasingly use technology-based tools including computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation software and AAC (augmentative and alternative communication) devices where needed. Voice disorders following intubation or laryngeal trauma are also within the SLP scope in acute TBI care.

Social communication training is a growing part of SLP work after TBI. It targets turn-taking, reading other people's cues and staying on topic, skills that often decide whether a person can keep friendships and hold a job.

Cognitive Rehabilitation

Cognitive rehabilitation encompasses the structured therapeutic efforts to improve attention, memory, executive function, and processing speed after brain injury. The field has moved well beyond paper-and-pencil exercises toward interventions tested in randomized controlled trials, and it is usually delivered by speech-language pathologists, occupational therapists and neuropsychologists working together.

Attention Process Training

Attention is the foundation of most cognitive function: if you cannot selectively attend to relevant information, memory encoding, working memory, and executive function all suffer downstream. Attention Process Training (APT), developed by Sohlberg and Mateer, is a structured hierarchy of attention tasks that has shown evidence of generalization to real-world functioning in TBI [5].

Strategy-Based Memory Training

Memory impairment is one of the most common and disabling consequences of TBI. Cognitive rehabilitation for memory focuses less on rote repetition and more on compensatory strategies: spaced retrieval practice, external memory aids, prospective memory training, and errorless learning techniques that reduce the cognitive load associated with learning new information. The goal is not just performance in a therapy session but carryover to daily life.

Executive Function Rehabilitation

The prefrontal cortex, which is particularly vulnerable to TBI due to its proximity to the bony ridges of the skull base, governs planning, flexible thinking, inhibitory control, and goal management. Metacognitive strategy training, which teaches patients to monitor and regulate their own cognitive processes, has shown efficacy for executive function deficits and generalization to real-world tasks [6].

HBOT in Rehabilitation Programs

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is used in some comprehensive brain injury rehabilitation programs because its proposed mechanisms complement what rehabilitation does. HBOT delivers 100 percent oxygen at raised pressure, and it is thought to address underlying pathology, specifically hypoxic injury, neuroinflammation, disrupted perfusion, and impaired metabolic function, while rehabilitation exploits the resulting improved neural function to drive adaptive plasticity [7].

The sequencing and combination of HBOT with rehabilitation matters. Some programs schedule HBOT sessions before cognitive rehabilitation sessions on the same day, reasoning that HBOT improves cerebral blood flow and metabolic state, making the brain more responsive to the neuroplastic stimulus of active rehabilitation. This is theoretically sound and anecdotally supported, though rigorous studies of this specific sequencing are limited.

For patients whose rehabilitation progress has plateaued, HBOT is one option some clinicians offer to try to restart gains. The Efrati group's randomized crossover trial, published by Boussi-Gross et al. in PLoS One (2013), gave 40 sessions at 1.5 atmospheres absolute (ATA) to people one to five years after a mild TBI and reported improvements in cognitive scores and brain perfusion on SPECT imaging [8]. That trial compared treatment with no treatment rather than with a sham chamber.

Sham-controlled trials in US service members have been less encouraging. Miller et al. (2015), published in JAMA Internal Medicine, found that HBOT did not improve post-concussion symptoms more than a sham exposure, although both groups improved [14]. The FDA has not cleared HBOT for brain injury, and the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society does not list TBI among its approved indications, so treatment for TBI is off label and usually cash pay. The list of FDA-cleared HBOT indications shows what insurers typically cover, and the HBOT treatment guide covers protocols, pressures and risks such as ear barotrauma.

Neurofeedback as a Rehabilitation Tool

Neurofeedback, also called EEG biofeedback, occupies a unique position in brain injury rehabilitation: it is neither cognitive exercise (like memory training) nor passive treatment (like HBOT), but something in between. Patients are active participants in training their own brainwave activity, using real-time feedback to guide the brain toward patterns associated with better attention, memory, mood regulation, and processing speed.

The foundation for neurofeedback in TBI rehabilitation is qEEG brain mapping, which provides an objective picture of where and how the injured brain's electrical activity deviates from normative databases. This allows practitioners to target the specific regions and frequency bands that are abnormal rather than applying a generic protocol [9]. For example, a patient with frontal lobe injury might show excess theta (4 to 7 Hz) activity in prefrontal regions, associated with attention and working memory difficulties. The neurofeedback protocol would target uptraining faster frequencies in those regions while downtraining the excess theta.

Small studies, including Thornton and Carmody (2005), report gains in TBI-related attention, processing speed, memory, and emotional regulation, but large sham-controlled trials in TBI are still lacking. Practitioners describe gains that continue to consolidate in the weeks after formal training ends as the brain reorganizes around newly established patterns. Licensed psychologists, neuropsychologists and counselors deliver most neurofeedback, and the neurofeedback therapy guide explains what a course involves. Providers who offer it are listed in the neurofeedback clinic directory.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is FDA cleared for major depressive disorder, and it is studied, rather than cleared, for TBI-associated depression and cognitive rehabilitation. Repetitive TMS (rTMS) with high-frequency protocols applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) can increase cortical excitability in an area critical for working memory and executive function, while low-frequency protocols can dampen hyperexcitable regions contributing to headache and anxiety [10].

The combination of TMS with cognitive rehabilitation is a particularly active area of research. A growing number of studies suggest that TMS applied before or during cognitive training can enhance the learning that occurs during training by increasing the plasticity state of targeted cortical regions. This has been studied most in stroke rehabilitation and is being extended to TBI populations.

For patients with TBI-associated depression, which is highly prevalent and strongly influences motivation and engagement with rehabilitation, treating the depression with TMS can have downstream effects on rehabilitation outcomes by increasing participation, improving sleep, and reducing the cognitive effects of depression itself. Psychiatrists usually prescribe and oversee TMS, and seizure is the main serious, though rare, risk. The TMS treatment guide covers candidacy, and practices that offer it appear in the TMS clinic list.

NAD+ IV Therapy as a Rehabilitation Support

The cognitive fatigue and mental fogging that compromise rehabilitation engagement in many TBI patients often have a metabolic basis. Mitochondrial dysfunction, NAD+ depletion, and impaired cellular energy metabolism reduce the brain's capacity for the sustained effort that rehabilitation requires. Patients may have the motivation to engage fully but find their cognitive and physical resources depleted within a short time.

NAD+ (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) IV therapy is offered on the theory that raising NAD+ supports the cellular energy machinery. Some patients receiving NAD+ IV therapy report improved mental stamina and reduced cognitive fatigue, but the supporting science comes mainly from laboratory and aging research such as Verdin (2015), not from controlled trials in brain injury [11]. NAD+'s role in sirtuin activation and DNA repair is well described in cells, while its benefit for neurons recovering after TBI remains unproven in people. It is cash pay and is not FDA approved for TBI.

Peptide Therapy in Rehabilitation

Peptides are being incorporated into some rehabilitation programs as proposed biological supports for neuroplasticity and recovery. Semax raised BDNF, a key neurotrophin for synaptogenesis and long-term potentiation, in animal studies, and researchers have proposed that this could make the brain more trainable [12]. Semax is a prescription drug in Russia and is not approved by the FDA.

Selank's effects on anxiety and emotional regulation, described mainly in Russian studies, are the rationale for using it to reduce the emotional reactivity and cognitive rigidity that often interfere with therapeutic engagement and social function after TBI. For patients struggling with the frustration and emotional lability that frequently accompany frontal lobe injury, some clinicians use Selank to try to stabilize the emotional environment needed for productive rehabilitation, without trial evidence in TBI.

BPC-157's anti-inflammatory effects and its modulation of dopamine and serotonin signaling, both of which are disrupted in TBI, come from animal research, and no human TBI trials have been published. The FDA has placed BPC-157 among bulk drug substances that raise significant safety concerns for compounding. The peptide therapy guide explains how these products are sourced and regulated.

How Strong Is the Evidence for Each Brain Injury Therapy?

The evidence for brain injury rehabilitation is strongest for coordinated multidisciplinary therapy and weakest for the newer metabolic and peptide adjuncts. The table summarizes the studies cited throughout this page, the clinicians who typically deliver each approach, and how it is usually paid for.

Psychological and Vocational Rehabilitation

Comprehensive rehabilitation addresses the person's life, not just their brain. Neuropsychological treatment for adjustment, identity reconstruction, and behavioral changes after TBI is as central as physical rehabilitation and is often the factor that determines whether the gains made in formal therapy translate to meaningful improvements in quality of life.

Depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are common after brain injury and slow every other part of recovery. Rehabilitation psychologists use cognitive behavioral therapy adapted for memory and attention limits, and family education helps relatives respond to irritability, fatigue and changed behavior.

Vocational rehabilitation, focused on return to meaningful work or productive activity, is a cornerstone of functional recovery for working-age TBI survivors. Supported employment models, job coaching, and workplace accommodation have strong evidence for improving employment outcomes after moderate and severe TBI [13]. For many patients, return to work is the ultimate measure of recovery success, and vocational rehabilitation should be integrated into the rehabilitation plan from early stages, not added as an afterthought.

Building the Rehabilitation Team

Effective brain injury rehabilitation requires a coordinated team. At a minimum, this typically includes a physiatrist or neurologist for medical oversight, physical and occupational therapists, a speech-language pathologist, a neuropsychologist, and a social worker or case manager. Depending on symptoms, the team may add a vestibular therapist, a neuro-optometrist, a psychiatrist and a vocational counselor. For programs incorporating regenerative medicine, a physician with expertise in HBOT, NAD+ therapy, and/or peptide therapy covers areas that standard rehabilitation medicine does not typically address.

The difference between fragmented care (where each provider works independently) and integrated team-based care (where providers communicate, share goals, and coordinate timing) is substantial and well documented in the rehabilitation literature [3]. Patients navigating TBI rehabilitation should actively seek out programs where disciplines communicate and where the treatment plan is genuinely individualized based on their specific injury, symptoms, and goals.

How to Choose a Brain Injury Rehabilitation Program

A good brain injury rehabilitation program has a physician leading a coordinated team, measures progress with standard tests, and is clear about which of its therapies are standard care and which are adjuncts with limited evidence. These questions help compare programs side by side.

1. Who leads the team? Ask whether a physiatrist, neurologist or other physician oversees the plan, and how often the therapists meet to review goals.
2. Is the program accredited? The Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) offers a specific brain injury specialty accreditation for inpatient and post-acute programs.
3. How is progress measured? Look for baseline and repeat testing with named tools, such as neuropsychological batteries or balance scales, rather than impressions alone.
4. Which therapies are evidence based and which are adjuncts? A trustworthy clinic separates covered standard therapy from cash-pay options such as HBOT, neurofeedback, NAD+ or peptides, and explains the evidence for each in plain terms.
5. What does a full course cost, and what is covered? Ask for the total number of sessions planned, the price in writing, and which parts insurance will pay for before starting.
6. How does the program involve family? Family training and a plan for home and community life predict how well gains carry over after discharge.

To compare adjunct providers near you, the national HBOT clinic directory lists hyperbaric centers by state and city, and the traumatic brain injury treatment guide explains how regenerative options fit next to conventional TBI care. Listing order on Regenerated.com is not paid ranking, Featured slots are labeled and capped, Verified means the clinic completed credential checks rather than paid for placement, and the directory is free for patients. Inclusion in the directory is not an endorsement, and the guide to Featured, Verified and organic listings explains each label.

Does Insurance Cover Brain Injury Rehabilitation?

Insurance usually covers conventional brain injury rehabilitation, including inpatient rehabilitation, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy and neuropsychological testing, when a physician documents medical necessity. Medicare, Medicaid and most private plans pay for these services, though plans often cap outpatient visits and require prior authorization.

Adjunct therapies are a different picture. HBOT for TBI, neurofeedback, NAD+ IV therapy and peptides are usually cash pay because they are off label or not FDA approved for brain injury. Prices vary widely by region and protocol, so ask each clinic for a written quote for the full planned course. Veterans may have access to TBI programs through the Department of Veterans Affairs Polytrauma System of Care, and people injured at work may have rehabilitation covered through workers' compensation.

Frequently asked questions

How long does brain injury rehabilitation take?

Brain injury rehabilitation lasts from a few weeks to several years. Most people with a concussion recover within weeks, while moderate and severe TBI often needs months of inpatient and outpatient therapy, with the fastest gains in the first six months. Progress can continue for years: Boussi-Gross et al. (2013) studied people one to five years after a mild TBI. A good program sets short goal blocks, re-tests, and adjusts the plan rather than promising a fixed end date.

Is it too late for rehabilitation years after a brain injury?

It is rarely too late to work on function after a brain injury. The brain keeps its capacity for synaptic plasticity at any age, and targeted cognitive, vocational and physical therapy can still improve daily life years later. Studies of HBOT and neurofeedback have enrolled people well past the first two years, though their evidence is mixed. A fresh neuropsychological assessment is the usual starting point, because it shows which deficits now limit work, relationships and independence.

Does hyperbaric oxygen therapy help brain injury recovery?

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy has mixed evidence for brain injury recovery. A randomized crossover trial by Boussi-Gross et al. (2013) reported cognitive gains after 40 sessions at 1.5 ATA in people with persistent symptoms after mild TBI, but the sham-controlled military trial by Miller et al. (2015) found no advantage over sham. The FDA has not cleared HBOT for TBI, so it is off label and usually cash pay, and most programs use it alongside conventional rehabilitation rather than instead of it.

Who is on a brain injury rehabilitation team?

A brain injury rehabilitation team is usually led by a physiatrist or neurologist and includes physical therapists, occupational therapists, a speech-language pathologist, a neuropsychologist and a social worker or case manager. Depending on symptoms, it may add a vestibular therapist, neuro-optometrist, psychiatrist, rehabilitation psychologist and vocational counselor. The Cochrane review by Turner-Stokes et al. (2015) supports this kind of coordinated multidisciplinary care, in which the team shares goals and plans therapy timing together.

What is the difference between inpatient and outpatient brain injury rehabilitation?

Inpatient brain injury rehabilitation takes place in a hospital unit or rehabilitation facility, with several hours of combined physical, occupational and speech therapy each day and round-the-clock medical care, and it suits moderate to severe TBI after hospital discharge. Outpatient rehabilitation means scheduled sessions while living at home, and it suits concussion, post-concussion syndrome and later stages of recovery. Many people move from inpatient to day treatment and then to outpatient therapy as their independence improves.

Does insurance pay for brain injury rehabilitation?

Insurance generally pays for conventional brain injury rehabilitation, including inpatient rehab, physical, occupational and speech therapy, and neuropsychological testing, when a physician documents medical necessity. Plans often limit visits and require prior authorization. Adjuncts such as HBOT, neurofeedback, NAD+ IV therapy and peptides are usually cash pay, because they are off label or not FDA approved for brain injury. Ask every provider for a written quote and a coverage check before treatment starts.

Related Reading

• TBI Treatment: Current Approaches and Regenerative Medicine Options
• TBI Recovery: What to Expect and How to Support Healing
• Post-Concussion Syndrome: Symptoms, Duration, and Treatment Options
• Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Brain Injury
• Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Benefits
• TMS for Depression
• Neurofeedback for ADHD
• Brain Fog Causes
• NAD+ IV Therapy
• Efrati Protocol vs Harch Protocol for HBOT

Sources

1. Cramer SC, et al. “Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications.” Brain. 2011;134(6):1591-1609. doi:10.1093/brain/awr039 ↩
2. Nudo RJ. “Adaptive plasticity in motor cortex: implications for rehabilitation after brain injury.” J Rehabil Med. 2003;(41 Suppl):7-10. doi:10.1080/16501960310010070 ↩
3. Turner-Stokes L, et al. “Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for acquired brain injury in adults of working age.” Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;12:CD004170. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004170.pub3 ↩
4. Coelho CA, et al. “Cognitive-communication disorders resulting from traumatic brain injury.” Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2018;3(2):5-36. doi:10.1044/persp3.SIG2.5 ↩
5. Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. “Effectiveness of an attention-training program.” J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1987;9(2):117-130. doi:10.1080/01688638708405352 ↩
6. Kennedy MRT, et al. “Effects of metacognitive strategy training on awareness and problem solving in adults with TBI.” J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(6):841-850. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2007.09.0147 ↩
7. Harch PG. “Hyperbaric oxygen in chronic traumatic brain injury: oxygen, pressure, and gene therapy.” Med Gas Res. 2015;5:9. doi:10.1186/s13618-015-0030-6 ↩
8. Boussi-Gross R, et al. “Hyperbaric oxygen therapy can improve post concussion syndrome years after mild traumatic brain injury: randomized prospective trial.” PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e79995. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079995 ↩
9. Thornton KE, Carmody DP. “Electroencephalogram biofeedback for reading disability and traumatic brain injury.” Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2005;14(1):137-162. doi:10.1016/j.chc.2004.07.001 ↩
10. Fitzgerald PB, Daskalakis ZJ. “Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for depressive disorders: a practical guide.” Springer; 2013. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36467-9 ↩
11. Verdin E. “NAD+ in aging, metabolism, and neurodegeneration.” Science. 2015;350(6265):1208-1213. doi:10.1126/science.aac4854 ↩
12. Dubynin VA, et al. “Semax and its analogs protect the brain from ischemia.” Exp Biol Med. 2006;231(6):921-927. PMID:16740990 ↩
13. Wehman P, et al. “Supported employment for individuals with traumatic brain injury: a preliminary investigation of long-term follow-up costs and program efficiency.” Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(2):192-196. doi:10.1053/apmr.2003.50027 ↩
14. Miller RS, Weaver LK, Bahraini N, et al. “Effects of hyperbaric oxygen on symptoms and quality of life among service members with persistent postconcussion symptoms: a randomized clinical trial.” JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(1):43-52. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5479 ↩