Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: Diagnostic Criteria, Types, and What the 2026 Updates Mean for You

If you have spent years hearing that you are “just flexible,” that your pain is “probably anxiety,” or that nothing is really wrong because your labs keep coming back normal, this article is for you. The experience of living in a body that dislocates, aches, and refuses to cooperate while doctors shrug their shoulders is not imaginary. It is not anxiety. And you are not alone. Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, particularly the hypermobile type, remains one of the most underdiagnosed connective tissue disorders in medicine, with patients waiting an average of 12 years before receiving a correct diagnosis. But the field is finally shifting. Here is what you need to know about the current diagnostic criteria, the research breakthroughs reshaping the field, and what the anticipated 2026 updates could mean for your journey toward answers.
- What Is Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome?
- The 2017 Diagnostic Criteria for Hypermobile EDS
- Criterion 1: Generalized Joint Hypermobility
- Criterion 2: Two or More of Three Features (A, B, or C)
- Criterion 3: Exclusion of Other Conditions
- Why These Criteria Are Controversial
- Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder vs. hEDS: Are They the Same Condition?
- The Road to 2026: What Is Changing?
- A Potential Blood Test for hEDS and HSD
- New Genes Identified: The Kallikrein Discovery
- Other Anticipated Changes
- The MCAS-POTS-EDS Triad
- How to Get Diagnosed
- Which Specialists to See
- What to Bring to Your Appointment
- What If You Do Not Meet the Criteria for hEDS?
- Living with EDS: Management Approaches
- Physical Therapy
- Bracing and Joint Support
- Pain Management
- Managing Comorbidities
- Autonomic and Nervous System Support
- Looking Ahead
- Related Reading
What Is Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome?
Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) is a group of heritable connective tissue disorders caused by defects in collagen and other structural proteins that hold the body together. Connective tissue is everywhere: in your skin, joints, blood vessels, organs, and gut lining. When that tissue is structurally compromised, the effects ripple across every system in the body.
The 2017 International Classification recognizes 13 subtypes of EDS, each with distinct genetic causes and clinical presentations. These include classical EDS (cEDS), vascular EDS (vEDS), kyphoscoliotic EDS, and others. Most subtypes have identified genetic markers and can be confirmed through genetic testing. The glaring exception is hypermobile EDS (hEDS), the most common subtype, which remains a clinical diagnosis with no confirmed genetic test.
This is the cruel irony of hEDS. It is the type most people have, the type that causes widespread pain and dysfunction, and the type that is hardest to prove. No single lab value. No definitive imaging finding. Just a clinical evaluation that many doctors have never been trained to perform.
The 2017 Diagnostic Criteria for Hypermobile EDS
The current diagnostic framework for hEDS was established by the International EDS Consortium in 2017. To receive an hEDS diagnosis, a patient must satisfy all three of the following criteria.
Criterion 1: Generalized Joint Hypermobility
The Beighton Score is a standardized screening tool that measures joint hypermobility on a 9-point scale. It evaluates five specific maneuvers: bending each pinky finger back beyond 90 degrees (2 points), bending each thumb to touch the forearm (2 points), hyperextending each elbow beyond 10 degrees (2 points), hyperextending each knee beyond 10 degrees (2 points), and placing both palms flat on the floor with knees straight (1 point).
The 2017 criteria introduced age-adjusted cutoffs because joint mobility naturally decreases with age:
- Children and adolescents: minimum 6 out of 9
- Adults up to age 50: minimum 5 out of 9
- Adults over age 50: minimum 4 out of 9
If you score one point below the cutoff for your age group, you can still meet Criterion 1 if you answer yes to at least two historical questions. These include things like, “As a child, could you contort your body into unusual shapes or do the splits?” and “Do you consider yourself double-jointed?” This is important because many patients lose measurable hypermobility over time due to injury, muscle guarding, or age, even though the underlying connective tissue disorder remains.
Criterion 2: Two or More of Three Features (A, B, or C)
To meet Criterion 2, you must have at least two of the following three features.
Feature A: Systemic manifestations of a connective tissue disorder (five or more required). This checklist includes unusually soft or velvety skin, unexplained stretch marks (particularly in adolescents or young men, or women who have never been pregnant), widened atrophic scars at two or more sites, pelvic floor or rectal prolapse, dental crowding combined with a high or narrow palate, arachnodactyly (unusually long fingers), arm span-to-height ratio greater than 1.05, mitral valve prolapse, and other signs.
Feature B: Positive family history. One or more first-degree relatives independently meet the diagnostic criteria for hEDS. Since hEDS is hereditary, a family pattern of hypermobility, chronic pain, joint dislocations, and related symptoms strongly supports the diagnosis.
Feature C: Musculoskeletal complications. This requires at least one of the following: musculoskeletal pain in two or more limbs recurring daily for at least three months, chronic widespread pain for at least three months, or recurrent joint dislocations (three or more in the same joint without trauma, or dislocations in two or more different joints).
Criterion 3: Exclusion of Other Conditions
Before an hEDS diagnosis can be made, other connective tissue disorders must be ruled out. This includes other EDS subtypes (particularly classical and vascular, which have genetic tests), Marfan syndrome, Loeys-Dietz syndrome, and autoimmune conditions like lupus or rheumatoid arthritis that could explain joint symptoms. This criterion exists to ensure diagnostic accuracy, but it also means that reaching a diagnosis often requires referrals to genetics, rheumatology, or both.
Why These Criteria Are Controversial
The 2017 criteria were designed to increase diagnostic specificity, and they succeeded at that. But many clinicians and researchers have criticized them as overly restrictive. Patients who clearly have symptomatic hypermobility, chronic pain, and systemic features may still fall short of the formal hEDS threshold. These patients are typically placed under the umbrella of Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder (HSD), a category that, while clinically valid, often carries less weight in medical settings and may not be recognized by insurance systems in many countries.
Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder vs. hEDS: Are They the Same Condition?
This is one of the most actively debated questions in the connective tissue disorder community. HSD was introduced alongside the 2017 hEDS criteria as a diagnostic category for people with symptomatic hypermobility who do not meet the full hEDS checklist. It is further divided into subtypes: Generalized HSD, Peripheral HSD, Localized HSD, and Historical HSD.
The original intent was to position HSD as a less severe condition than hEDS. But the evidence has not supported that assumption. Research consistently shows that patients with HSD can experience pain, fatigue, and disability just as severe as those with hEDS. Management approaches are identical. Long-term outcomes after coordinated physical therapy are similar.
A 2025 study from the Mayo Clinic examined over 2,600 patients and found that those with localized and historical HSD reported symptoms and comorbidities that closely resembled generalized HSD and hEDS. The 2025 biomarker research (discussed below) found the same fibronectin fragment pattern in both hEDS and HSD patients, further suggesting a shared molecular mechanism.
The emerging consensus leans toward viewing these conditions as existing on a spectrum rather than as fundamentally different diseases. If the 2026 criteria update reflects this view, it could mean fewer patients falling through diagnostic gaps, and more people gaining access to the recognition and care they need.
The Road to 2026: What Is Changing?
The Ehlers-Danlos Society launched the “Road to 2026” initiative to produce the first major update to EDS classification since 2017. The work is being led by the International Consortium on EDS and HSD, bringing together researchers, clinicians, and patient advocates. The updated criteria are expected to be published in late 2026 as a peer-reviewed, open-access journal edition. Here are the key developments shaping that update.
A Potential Blood Test for hEDS and HSD
In 2025, a landmark study published in the American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A identified what may become the first blood-based biomarker for hEDS and HSD. Researchers analyzed blood samples from 466 adults and discovered that all patients with hEDS or HSD carried a specific 52-kilodalton fragment of fibronectin in their plasma. This fragment was completely absent in healthy controls and in patients with classical EDS, vascular EDS, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and osteoarthritis.
A collagen I fragment was also found in all hEDS and HSD patients, though this marker was less specific because it also appeared in rheumatoid arthritis patients. The combination of both markers creates a distinctive signature that appears unique to hEDS and HSD.
If larger validation studies confirm these findings, a simple blood test could replace or supplement the lengthy clinical evaluation process. For someone who has spent a decade trying to get a diagnosis, this is potentially transformative. The Ehlers-Danlos Society is sponsoring additional studies to validate these biomarkers in larger and more diverse populations.
New Genes Identified: The Kallikrein Discovery
For years, hEDS was the only EDS subtype without a known genetic cause. That began to change in 2024 when researchers from the Norris Lab at the Medical University of South Carolina identified variants in the Kallikrein gene family (specifically KLK15) that appear to play a role in hEDS. Whole-exome sequencing of 200 patients with hEDS revealed rare variants in 14 of the 15 Kallikrein genes, including a recurring KLK15 variant that segregated with disease in multiple families.
Mouse models engineered with the KLK15 variant displayed connective tissue defects across multiple organ systems, consistent with the clinical picture of hEDS. Importantly, Kallikrein genes also play roles in blood pressure regulation and immune cell function, which may help explain why conditions like POTS and MCAS so frequently accompany hEDS.
This does not mean a single genetic test for hEDS is imminent. The genetics of hEDS are likely polygenic, involving multiple genes. But the Kallikrein findings represent the most significant genetic advance in hEDS research to date and will inform the 2026 criteria update.
Other Anticipated Changes
- Beighton Score revisions: The committee is reviewing whether to modify the Beighton scale to include commonly affected joints like hips and shoulders, which the current scale does not assess.
- New subtypes: hEDS may be split into additional subtypes based on symptom clusters and emerging genetic markers, recognizing that the current “hEDS” category likely encompasses multiple distinct presentations.
- Integration of systemic symptoms: Comorbidities like dysautonomia, mast cell activation, gastrointestinal dysfunction, and brain fog may be formally incorporated into diagnostic criteria rather than treated as secondary associations.
- HSD reclassification: The diagnostic relationship between HSD and hEDS is expected to be clarified, with the possibility that they will be recognized as points on the same spectrum rather than separate entities.
The MCAS-POTS-EDS Triad
If you have hEDS, there is a significant chance you also deal with Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS), Mast Cell Activation Syndrome (MCAS), or both. This cluster is so common that it has earned its own name: the trifecta. We cover this overlap in depth in our article on the MCAS, POTS, and EDS triad, but here is a brief summary of why these conditions travel together.
The connective tissue defects in EDS affect blood vessel walls, making them overly compliant. When you stand, blood pools in the lower body because the vessels stretch too easily. The autonomic nervous system compensates by dramatically increasing heart rate, producing the hallmark symptoms of POTS: dizziness, racing heart, brain fog, and exercise intolerance. This autonomic dysfunction also connects to broader patterns of nervous system dysregulation and vagus nerve involvement.
Mast cells are immune cells embedded within connective tissue throughout the body. When connective tissue is structurally abnormal, the mechanical environment around mast cells changes. Research suggests this may contribute to inappropriate mast cell activation, leading to symptoms like flushing, hives, gastrointestinal distress, and anaphylactoid reactions. The relationship also appears to flow in the other direction: mast cell-derived enzymes may further degrade already-vulnerable connective tissue, creating a feedback loop.
The Kallikrein gene discovery adds another dimension. Kallikreins are involved in both blood pressure regulation and immune cell function, which could provide a genetic explanation for why EDS, POTS, and MCAS cluster together so reliably.
How to Get Diagnosed
Getting an EDS diagnosis requires seeing the right specialist with the right information. This is not a condition most primary care doctors are trained to identify. Here is a practical roadmap.
Which Specialists to See
- Geneticist or genetic counselor: This is the gold standard for EDS diagnosis. A medical geneticist can perform a detailed connective tissue evaluation, order genetic testing to rule out other EDS subtypes, and formally apply the hEDS diagnostic criteria.
- Rheumatologist: Some rheumatologists are experienced with hypermobility disorders and can perform the clinical assessment. However, EDS awareness varies widely among rheumatologists, so it is worth confirming the provider has experience with connective tissue disorders specifically.
- Neurologist or cardiologist: If you have symptoms of POTS or small fiber neuropathy, a specialist in dysautonomia can evaluate and treat these comorbidities while supporting the broader diagnostic picture.
- Physical therapist: A PT experienced with hypermobility can provide both functional assessment and treatment. While they cannot formally diagnose EDS, their evaluation of joint instability and movement patterns can generate valuable documentation for your medical record.
What to Bring to Your Appointment
- A symptom timeline: Document when symptoms started, how they have progressed, and what body systems are affected. Include joint dislocations or subluxations, chronic pain patterns, skin changes, gastrointestinal issues, and any autonomic symptoms.
- Family medical history: Note any relatives with hypermobility, chronic pain, early-onset arthritis, heart conditions (especially mitral valve prolapse), or unexplained multisystem symptoms. Family history of these conditions strengthens the case for a connective tissue disorder.
- Photos and documentation: Photographs of skin hyperextensibility, unusual scarring, joint hyperextension, or bruising can be helpful. Bring any prior imaging, genetic test results, or specialist reports.
- The diagnostic checklist: The Ehlers-Danlos Society publishes a printable hEDS diagnostic criteria checklist. Filling this out before your appointment and bringing it with you can help ensure nothing is overlooked, especially if your provider is less familiar with the condition.
What If You Do Not Meet the Criteria for hEDS?
If you have symptomatic hypermobility but do not meet the full hEDS criteria, you may receive an HSD diagnosis. This is not a lesser diagnosis. It acknowledges that your connective tissue is causing real symptoms that require real management. The treatment approach is the same. And as the 2026 criteria update approaches, the diagnostic field may shift in ways that better capture the full spectrum of hypermobility-related conditions.
Living with EDS: Management Approaches
There is currently no cure for EDS. Management focuses on reducing symptoms, preventing injury, and improving quality of life. Because EDS affects multiple body systems, effective care is almost always multidisciplinary.
Physical Therapy
This is the cornerstone of EDS management. The goal is to build muscular stability around hypermobile joints without triggering flares. Traditional physical therapy can be harmful if the therapist pushes range of motion rather than focusing on neuromuscular control. Look for a PT who understands hypermobility and emphasizes proprioceptive training, isometric strengthening, and joint stabilization. Low-impact activities like swimming, Pilates (modified for hypermobility), and walking are often well-tolerated.
Bracing and Joint Support
Custom or over-the-counter braces, ring splints for fingers, ankle supports, and kinesiology tape can help stabilize vulnerable joints during daily activities. The goal is supportive stabilization, not immobilization, since restricting movement entirely can lead to deconditioning and worsen long-term outcomes.
Pain Management
Pain in EDS is complex. It may be mechanical (from joint instability), neuropathic (from nerve compression or small fiber neuropathy), or inflammatory (from tissue damage and mast cell activation). Effective pain management often combines physical therapy, medications (such as low-dose naltrexone, gabapentin, or topical treatments), and sometimes interventional procedures. Many EDS patients also report benefits from addressing brain fog and sleep disruption, which can amplify pain perception.
Managing Comorbidities
For many people with EDS, the comorbidities are more disabling than the joint symptoms. POTS may require salt loading, compression garments, and medications to manage blood pressure and heart rate. MCAS often responds to a combination of antihistamines, mast cell stabilizers, and trigger avoidance. Gastrointestinal dysfunction may need targeted dietary approaches and motility support. Each of these areas benefits from specialist involvement and a coordinated care plan.
Autonomic and Nervous System Support
Given the high prevalence of dysautonomia in EDS, strategies that support autonomic regulation can be valuable. Vagus nerve stimulation techniques, graded exercise protocols, and nervous system regulation practices may help manage the autonomic dysfunction that drives many of the most disabling symptoms.
Looking Ahead
For people living with undiagnosed hypermobility, the next few years hold genuine reason for hope. The combination of plasma biomarker research, the Kallikrein gene discoveries, and the full 2026 criteria update could fundamentally change how EDS and HSD are identified and validated. A future where a blood test can support what patients have known about their own bodies for years is no longer theoretical. It is being actively built.
In the meantime, your symptoms are real. Your pain deserves to be taken seriously. And a 12-year diagnostic journey is not a reflection of the complexity of your body. It is a reflection of a medical system that is still catching up to connective tissue science.
Related Reading
- The MCAS, POTS, and EDS Triad: Understanding the Connection
- Vagus Nerve and Autoimmune Conditions
- Brain Fog: Causes, Mechanisms, and What Actually Helps
- Nervous System Dysregulation: What It Is and How to Address It
- Small Fiber Neuropathy: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment
Medical Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. The content is based on published research and clinical guidelines available as of March 2026. Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome is a complex condition that requires individualized evaluation by qualified healthcare providers. Always consult with a medical professional before making decisions about your diagnosis or treatment. Regenerated Health does not diagnose, treat, or provide medical consultations.



